← Back to CoursesTensorFlow & AI Programming: PhD Level

Neuroanatomy Explorer

Drag to rotate · scroll to zoom · click regions to explore

View
Loading 3D model…

Click a region
to explore it

Memory Deck

Flip each card and rate whether you knew it. Your score is saved.

Term
Definition

Deck complete — score saved.

Match the Pairs

Match each term to its definition. Finish the board to earn your score.

All matched — score saved.

Concept Constellation

Every key idea in this course, mapped as an explorable 3D constellation. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom, click a node.

Click a node to read its definition.

Distributed Training, Mixed Precision, and Accelerator Systems

Manual: General · Subject: TensorFlow & AI Programming

Scale TensorFlow training across devices and clusters while reasoning about numerical and systems tradeoffs.

Scaling beyond a single device

Parallelism at the systems level

Distributed training uses data parallelism, model parallelism, or hybrid strategies to reduce wall-clock time and fit larger models. TensorFlow supports these patterns through distribution strategies, collective communication, and careful placement of variables and computations.

Scaling strategies

StrategyBest forTradeoff
Data parallelismMany examples, moderate model sizeCommunication overhead for gradients
Model parallelismModels too large for one deviceComplex partitioning and synchronization
Pipeline parallelismVery deep modelsBubbles and scheduling complexity
Hybrid parallelismFrontier-scale systemsHighest engineering complexity

What is the main idea of data parallel training?

Mixed precision training

Mixed precision uses lower-precision formats such as float16\mathrm{float16} or bfloat16\mathrm{bfloat16} for many computations while preserving critical accumulators and master weights where needed. This can increase throughput and reduce memory use, but numerical stability must be monitored carefully.

⚠️

Numerical stability

When using mixed precision, watch for overflow, underflow, and loss scaling issues that can silently degrade training.

Distributed training sanity checks

  1. 1

    Verify each worker sees a unique data shard.

  2. 2

    Confirm that global batch size matches the intended optimization regime.

  3. 3

    Check that metric aggregation is consistent across replicas.

  4. 4

    Profile communication bottlenecks relative to compute time.

  5. 5

    Validate determinism assumptions only where the platform truly supports them.

Why is communication overhead a concern in distributed training?

Which low-precision format is often favored for better dynamic range on modern accelerators?

Name one benefit of mixed precision training.