← Back to CoursesSocial Sciences: PhD Level

Neuroanatomy Explorer

Drag to rotate · scroll to zoom · click regions to explore

View
Loading 3D model…

Click a region
to explore it

Memory Deck

Flip each card and rate whether you knew it. Your score is saved.

Term
Definition

Deck complete — score saved.

Match the Pairs

Match each term to its definition. Finish the board to earn your score.

All matched — score saved.

Concept Constellation

Every key idea in this course, mapped as an explorable 3D constellation. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom, click a node.

Click a node to read its definition.

Theory Building and Causal Inference in the Social World

Manual: General · Subject: Social Sciences

This lesson examines how social scientists generate theories and estimate causal effects under interference, heterogeneity, and endogeneity.

From Concepts to Causal Claims

Theory as a Testable Structure

A theory in social science is a structured set of concepts, assumptions, and mechanisms that implies observable implications. Strong theory does more than correlate variables: it predicts when and where effects should change, what mediates them, and which boundary conditions limit generalization.

🔑

A Useful Rule

If a theory cannot distinguish between competing observations, it is too vague to guide research design or cumulative science.

Core Causal Concepts

Treatment
A manipulable or conceptual cause under study.
Outcome
The dependent variable or target phenomenon.
Counterfactual
What would have happened under an alternative cause.
Confounding
A common cause of treatment and outcome.
Mediation
A pathway through which a cause affects an outcome.
Moderation
A condition that changes effect size or direction.

Identification and Estimation

Modern causal inference distinguishes identification from estimation. Identification asks whether a causal effect is recoverable from assumptions and data; estimation asks how to compute it with finite samples. This distinction is central to regression discontinuity, difference-in-differences, instrumental variables, matching, synthetic control, and randomized experiments.

Common Causal Designs

Randomized controlled trial

  • Strong internal validity under compliance
  • May have limited external validity
  • Often expensive or ethically constrained

Observational design

  • Broader real-world scope
  • Requires stronger modeling assumptions
  • Highly vulnerable to confounding and selection

What does identification primarily concern?

Why is 'endogeneity' a problem for causal inference?

Frontier Issues

Current research increasingly focuses on treatment effect heterogeneity, causal inference with interference and spillovers, transportability across populations, and the limits of standard assumptions in networked or dynamic settings. A major open problem is how to learn credible causal mechanisms when the social environment adapts to the intervention itself.

Which design is especially associated with a discontinuity in assignment near a threshold?