← Back to CoursesEvolutionary Biology: PhD Level

Neuroanatomy Explorer

Drag to rotate · scroll to zoom · click regions to explore

View
Loading 3D model…

Click a region
to explore it

Memory Deck

Flip each card and rate whether you knew it. Your score is saved.

Term
Definition

Deck complete — score saved.

Match the Pairs

Match each term to its definition. Finish the board to earn your score.

All matched — score saved.

Concept Constellation

Every key idea in this course, mapped as an explorable 3D constellation. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom, click a node.

Click a node to read its definition.

Population Genetics I: Deterministic and Stochastic Change in Allele Frequencies

Manual: General · Subject: Evolutionary Biology

This lesson develops the quantitative machinery for selection, drift, mutation, and migration in finite populations.

Allele-frequency dynamics

Deterministic evolution

For a biallelic locus with allele frequency pp, selection changes allele frequencies according to genotype fitnesses. In simple cases, deterministic recursion equations show how advantageous alleles increase, how recessive mutations can persist, and how dominance modifies trajectories. In continuous time, analogous dynamics can be written as differential equations.

💡

Interpretation tip

Inference from allele-frequency change is always confounded by demography unless genealogical context is modeled explicitly.

Selection and drift

Selection is directional and can be weak or strong depending on the magnitude of ss. Drift introduces sampling variance on the order of 1/(2Ne)1/(2N_e) per generation in diploids. When ∣s∣≪1/(2Ne)|s| \ll 1/(2N_e), drift can dominate; when ∣s∣≫1/(2Ne)|s| \gg 1/(2N_e), selection is more likely to dominate.

Canonical forces and their signatures

ForceTypical signature
SelectionConsistent directional change tied to fitness differences
DriftRandom walk with variance increasing over time
MutationIntroduction of new alleles, usually at low frequency
MigrationAllele-frequency shifts coupled to gene flow

When is drift most likely to overpower selection?

What does the Wright-Fisher model primarily capture?

Models of selection

Hard selection

  • Fitness affects absolute contribution to future generations
  • Population growth may change with environment

Soft selection

  • Fitness is often relative within local context
  • Total contributions can be normalized among competitors

Which parameter most directly controls the rate at which neutral heterozygosity is lost by drift?

Workflow for a simple allele-frequency analysis

  1. 1

    Estimate allele frequencies across time points or populations.

  2. 2

    Specify a population-genetic model for drift, selection, and migration.

  3. 3

    Fit parameters by likelihood, Bayesian, or simulation-based inference.

  4. 4

    Check identifiability and sensitivity to demographic assumptions.

  5. 5

    Compare neutral and selection models using model selection or posterior predictive checks.

State the Hardy-Weinberg expectation for genotype frequencies at a biallelic locus with allele frequencies pp and qq.