← Back to CoursesStatistics: PhD Level

Neuroanatomy Explorer

Drag to rotate · scroll to zoom · click regions to explore

View
Loading 3D model…

Click a region
to explore it

Memory Deck

Flip each card and rate whether you knew it. Your score is saved.

Term
Definition

Deck complete — score saved.

Match the Pairs

Match each term to its definition. Finish the board to earn your score.

All matched — score saved.

Concept Constellation

Every key idea in this course, mapped as an explorable 3D constellation. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom, click a node.

Click a node to read its definition.

Hypothesis Testing, p-Values, and Multiple Comparisons

Manual: General · Subject: Statistics

Develop modern testing theory from Neyman-Pearson optimality to false discovery control.

Classical Testing Theory

Null and alternative hypotheses

A test considers H0H_0 against H1H_1. A rejection region is chosen to control Type I error α=P(reject H0∣H0 true)\alpha = P(\text{reject }H_0\mid H_0 \text{ true}), while power is 1−β=P(reject H0∣H1 true)1-\beta = P(\text{reject }H_0\mid H_1 \text{ true}).

Neyman-Pearson lemma

For testing simple H0H_0 versus simple H1H_1, the likelihood ratio test is uniformly most powerful among level-α\alpha tests. This result underpins much of classical testing theory.

⚠️

Interpretation warning

A p-value is not the probability that H0H_0 is true; it is the probability of observing data at least as extreme as the data observed, under H0H_0.

p-Values and evidence

Calibration

A p-value is a tail-area probability computed under the null model. Small p-values indicate incompatibility with H0H_0, but evidence strength depends on sample size, model quality, and multiplicity.

Which quantity is controlled by the significance level α\alpha?

Why can very small p-values still be misleading in large samples?

Multiple testing and false discovery

Multiplicity

When many hypotheses are tested, naive thresholding inflates false positives. Modern methods control the family-wise error rate or the false discovery rate, often via Bonferroni, Holm, Benjamini-Hochberg, and empirical Bayes approaches.

Error rates

Family-wise error rate
Probability of at least one false rejection among a family of tests.
False discovery rate
Expected proportion of rejected hypotheses that are false discoveries.
Power
Probability of correctly rejecting a false null.

What does the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure primarily control?

Give one reason to prefer FDR control over family-wise error control in large-scale screening problems.