Causal Inference and Experimental Design
Potential outcomes framework
Causal estimands
In the potential outcomes framework, each unit has potential outcomes and . The average treatment effect is , which is generally not directly observable because only one potential outcome is realized per unit.
Identification
Randomization makes treatment independent of potential outcomes, enabling unbiased estimation of causal effects. In observational studies, identification requires assumptions such as unconfoundedness, overlap, and correct adjustment for confounders.
Fundamental problem
Causal inference is about identifying counterfactuals that can never be observed simultaneously for the same unit.
Experimental design
Design before analysis
Good experiments prioritize randomization, blocking, stratification, blinding, and pre-specification. Power analysis and sensitivity to noncompliance or attrition are essential at the design stage.
What is the main advantage of randomization in causal inference?
Randomization makes treatment assignment independent of potential outcomes in expectation, supporting unbiased estimation.
Correct answer: It balances observed and unobserved confounders in expectation
State the average treatment effect in potential outcomes notation.
The ATE averages unit-level treatment effects over the population.
Correct answer:
Observational causal inference and frontier methods
Modern approaches
Propensity scores, inverse probability weighting, matching, marginal structural models, instrumental variables, regression discontinuity, difference-in-differences, synthetic control, and doubly robust estimators are central methods for observational causal analysis.
Identification strategies
Which assumption is most central to standard propensity score adjustment?
Propensity score methods adjust for observed confounders but cannot remove bias from unmeasured confounding.
Correct answer: No unmeasured confounding
Why are doubly robust estimators attractive?
This provides robustness against moderate model misspecification.
Correct answer: They remain consistent if either the treatment model or the outcome model is correctly specified, not necessarily both.