← Back to CoursesStatistics: PhD Level

Neuroanatomy Explorer

Drag to rotate · scroll to zoom · click regions to explore

View
Loading 3D model…

Click a region
to explore it

Memory Deck

Flip each card and rate whether you knew it. Your score is saved.

Term
Definition

Deck complete — score saved.

Match the Pairs

Match each term to its definition. Finish the board to earn your score.

All matched — score saved.

Concept Constellation

Every key idea in this course, mapped as an explorable 3D constellation. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom, click a node.

Click a node to read its definition.

Causal Inference and Experimental Design

Manual: General · Subject: Statistics

Infer interventions and treatment effects using randomized experiments, observational adjustments, and identification strategies.

Potential outcomes framework

Causal estimands

In the potential outcomes framework, each unit has potential outcomes Y(1)Y(1) and Y(0)Y(0). The average treatment effect is τ=E[Y(1)−Y(0)]\tau=\mathbb{E}[Y(1)-Y(0)], which is generally not directly observable because only one potential outcome is realized per unit.

Identification

Randomization makes treatment independent of potential outcomes, enabling unbiased estimation of causal effects. In observational studies, identification requires assumptions such as unconfoundedness, overlap, and correct adjustment for confounders.

🔑

Fundamental problem

Causal inference is about identifying counterfactuals that can never be observed simultaneously for the same unit.

Experimental design

Design before analysis

Good experiments prioritize randomization, blocking, stratification, blinding, and pre-specification. Power analysis and sensitivity to noncompliance or attrition are essential at the design stage.

What is the main advantage of randomization in causal inference?

State the average treatment effect in potential outcomes notation.

Observational causal inference and frontier methods

Modern approaches

Propensity scores, inverse probability weighting, matching, marginal structural models, instrumental variables, regression discontinuity, difference-in-differences, synthetic control, and doubly robust estimators are central methods for observational causal analysis.

Identification strategies

Propensity score
Balances observed covariates under correct specification.
Instrumental variables
Uses exogenous variation correlated with treatment but not directly with the outcome.
Regression discontinuity
Compares units near a threshold to estimate local causal effects.
Synthetic control
Constructs a weighted control unit to approximate a counterfactual trajectory.

Which assumption is most central to standard propensity score adjustment?

Why are doubly robust estimators attractive?