← Back to CoursesHealth & Fitness: PhD Level

Neuroanatomy Explorer

Drag to rotate · scroll to zoom · click regions to explore

View
Loading 3D model…

Click a region
to explore it

Memory Deck

Flip each card and rate whether you knew it. Your score is saved.

Term
Definition

Deck complete — score saved.

Match the Pairs

Match each term to its definition. Finish the board to earn your score.

All matched — score saved.

Concept Constellation

Every key idea in this course, mapped as an explorable 3D constellation. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom, click a node.

Click a node to read its definition.

Measurement, Statistics, Causal Inference, and Research Design

Manual: General · Subject: Health & Fitness

Develop the methodological toolkit needed to evaluate exercise and nutrition studies with rigor and reproducibility.

⚠️

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for educational purposes only. Always consult a qualified medical professional or certified trainer before making decisions about your health, exercise, or fitness regimen.

How to know whether an intervention truly works

Evidence hierarchy is necessary but not sufficient

A randomized trial is powerful, but not all questions are randomized, and not all randomized studies are well designed. Researchers must understand bias, confounding, measurement error, missingness, and external validity.

🔑

Causal thinking

Association does not imply causation; the central challenge is identifying the counterfactual outcome that would have occurred without the intervention.

Core methodological terms

Randomization
Assignment method that reduces confounding on average.
Blinding
Masking allocation or condition to reduce expectancy bias.
Effect size
Magnitude of difference or association, not just statistical significance.
Reliability
Consistency of a measure across repeated trials.
Validity
Whether a measure captures what it intends to measure.

Study designs

DesignStrengthWeakness
Cross-sectionalFast and inexpensiveCannot establish temporal sequence
CohortTracks outcomes over timeConfounding and attrition
Randomized controlled trialStrong causal inferenceCostly and sometimes less generalizable
Mendelian randomizationUses genetic instrumentsAssumptions may fail

Which design is generally strongest for causal inference when feasible?

What is a confounder?

Reliability vs validity

Reliability

  • Consistency
  • Precision
  • Can be high even if the measure is wrong

Validity

  • Accuracy
  • Construct relevance
  • Depends on correct interpretation

Why is effect size important?

Define external validity.